Snake Brain Election

Chap. 1. Deja vu -ing Sumer again this summer

Chap. 2. MARDUK's advent.

REVERSING WHAT UNDER GOD (psych-sem opposite: Under Absolute Non-Being) => (GOD <=> NON-BEING)

meant in America's founding documents

(<= so that Snake Brain functionaries predicating on its original sacral vocabulary automatically block (<=by 'catching'/mix-mismatching) the completion of its destiny under them.)

AND WHY PROTESTANTS ONLY
can invoke it FOR AMERICA (if only they c/would)


MID-TERM SNAKE BRAIN ELECTIONS


This is where the Satanic snake brain named G.W. Bush duped America. In the '02 Mid Term election he announced the targeted swing vote was Catholics and Jews. That cast the die that set the stone that became today's SCOTUS. (<=Constraint on strategic predication) Saving "The Unborn" became the Catholics ceaseless "values issue", inserting their politics into America's birth canal. "Same sex marriage" became the leading snake brain edge of 'liberals', always associated with "Jewish causes", by a large majority, while also allied, qua pro-Israel, with pro-military 'right wing' politics. "Snake brain" here means MARDUK residue, still trying to take over earth from En.lil-ites. The period 2000-2002 was a "4th turning" moment from Reagan Reversals ("Support the Contras", "one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist") Personified and dramatized in Genesis, The Snake is Eve's Dark Side; in evolutionary terms, it is the serpentine, pre-mammalian brain of the spinal cord functioning in Humanity from the time of its Inception. (Humanity had a birth on earth, too, and what that meant is at stake now, too.


(notes on "UNDER GOD"

A. As prepositional phrase

Psychosemiotic analogue:

"Content of Consciousness Under Sign-Use (S*)"
( C'C = S*(Ql, v) ) (read: "The sign-use S* communicates a content of consciousness consisting of present quality Ql with intensities v." Ex. "this blue spot" <= ("this spot is blue"=> S*2 referring to an instance of S*1)

"UNDER X" where x is: -spatial: underneath, defined by vertical relations.

Extrapolated uses: (gradient of applications)

Sex --"under my thumb"; bottom .... "x is penetrated"
Index -- filing system: "under the heading...; ..classification; ... category, .. Title, ..."x is designated."
Law --authority to restrain behavior; "under the jurisdiction of..." courts... "x is judged."

The common sense of "under" ranges from space through sex to S* constraint, communicating a sense of up-to-down transition, connoting subordination to a "upper" force in a passive-active relation, with felt authoritative 'pressure' to yield. The psychodynamic moment shared UNDER GOD in Colonial America, circa 1700-1800, evoked willing surrender by each to the Idea held in reverent respect by all.

The Holy Will embraced in this intent (cf. Kant's argument for the existence of God) has created the gap in secular-soul talk that has allowed America's God- force to 'descend' to the level of generic "Monotheism". This is the MARDUK level of soul-evolution.
****
****
FORMS OF NON-BEING: (given that what-is-not does not exist and cannot be referred to without psychosemiotic self-contradiction. ("the nothing" is
syntactical nonsense, through it took millenia of hard philosophical thought to arrive at it (Parmenides: Being is One; Kant: existence is not a predicate; L. Wittgenstein: the world is everything that is the case.) )

-impossible denominatives (terms used as subjects of sentences which cannot in principle refer to anything, but : (~S*/S*) ("the object that is black and white all over at the same time"; in propositions: "x is P and x is not P" (Px . ~Px).

-Predication on impossible denominatives

B. in America's founding discourse

is, foremost, NOT UNDER MAN.

It has just occurred to me after all these years that "UNDER GOD", as
it occurred in America's originating documents, was used "on the token side" to communicate what it excludes: "NOT UNDER MAN". "On the token side" means, "was used because saying the word 'GOD' precludes. by its very pronouncement, the thought of any other entity that might be designated." Whatever it = X, might be, "God is greater than X" is tautological, on the authority of St. Anselm, himself, speaking for Roman Catholic theology.

"Under" is a metaphor for, first, subordination. (types: sexual "-the sheets"; instinctual "-the yoke"; logical "-S* type* (or category)"; legal "-the law"; discourse ("-the grammatical rules"); political ("-the sway of (ideology)"), governental ("-the rule of"),

The intention expressed by use of "God" is to address The Completing Totality, as such. It points to (carries the text of) unsurpassable superordination. "The Being Than Which No Greater Can Be Conceived," as Anselm defined it. This "Squares" textuality itself on use of the token "God" for "the Being". A self-contained content is thereby constructed for thought (as 'conception") to revive, around use of the word as a Name. ("The Name of God" is a similar psychochemitc construct, usable for pre-emptive predication "...is hidden from ordinary humanity" etc..) Thus, by definition, for all persons capable of consciously using the terms, "UNDER GOD" Squares* the intention of The Completing Totality as superordinate, with the situation of actual utterance (as in avowels, pledges, graveside ceremonies, prophecy, curses, etc.), addressing the New, Completing Totality Squared as from the side of consciousness completing its own totality through Sign-Use.

This is the psychosemiotic translation of Anselm's definition of "God" as "The Being Than Which No Greater Can Be Conceived" -- self-containment of textuality itself by predicating on the token.)


As symbol of national unity discourse

JUSTIFICATION

A symbol of unity to which allegiance is sworn is required if nationlal discourse is to have a common designated feeling state. That follows from the way communication works.