Return of Quezacotl

Generation(s), Gender, Genes

A Model of how Fibbonnaci may have figured it out (from breeding rabbits)

INFERENCE FROM ARCHETYPES

Mind-task: set up models for communicating/-ed phenomena such that, if applied at one point, inferences can be made to other otherwise unrelated points through how the model 'works' -- the relations between its parts serving as inference threads.

Models are Forms through which intelligibility is reflected in the phenomena. Among the oldest Forms to be discerned in communicated discourse are mathematical, specifically, progressions that can be plotted geometrically, as the counting numbers to different 'bases' of ordered repetition-markers (as the number of 0's following a digit 1-9 orders the size of base 10 numbers). The shape of deduction from geometrical forms, "reasoning" from "premises" to "conclusions" through the Form "Given ( partial specification: 'a point x on a line b etc.), it must also be true ("it follows") that (Such and such..).

In the course of time and refinement of articulate expression, the relationship of the Given to the Such and such in this essential Form became shortened to IF ..Then, and generalized to wherever "reason", or the sense of logical connectedness, is to be found in discourse. And rationality, connecting two statements or propositions by links of logical deductive necessity, is only one Form of what is intelligible to conscious psychic functions through sign-use.

The Soul, if it is a separate brain, finds Forms, as psychodynamic templates ('complexes') repeated in discourse (mostly in religious language; cf. mythopoeisis). From a part of one of these, the mind as conscious process is drawn to pass from one content, to another content belonging to another part (of discourse), presupposing only psychic, not causal connections in space. Such Forms are thus a unity recognized by the psyche, through its psych-ology, available, after analysis, to be further predicated on in the language of science-cum-gnosis. They define units that can be said to exist in TokenSpace, entailing higher orders of synthesis of experienced content, looped through associations collectively mediated (first, as ritual). In Jungian psychology, models of this sort are called "Archetypes", pervading individual consciousness mediated by the great collective ancestry of human Symbols; thus "of the Collective Unconscious". These are the Givens of common cosmic ancient discourse; the psychosynchronities of today's discourse are the Such and such. TokenSpace is the New Frontier of the intelligible. How "we" "make contact", "stay in touch", in the acts, artefacts, gadgets and objects now existing throughout the social network solely to facilitate communication (Instantly! Totally! Today!) is by Archetypes of the collective unconscious. This phenomena represents the Soul coming to dominance over the Mind in the collective torrent of discourse.

TIME AND SOUL CONTENT

The three-brain archetecture of the anatomy (Gurdjieff) relates the person as a whole to reality through three separate and distinct ways temporal duration is experienced. (in reversed order of evolutionary development to mark 'distance' from ordinary waking consciousness)

Brain 3 (serpent) relates to time only through base-biological arousal functions: defense against territorial ingression, nutrition, reproduction. This encompasses the memory of pre-mammalian evolution. (Quezacotl)

Brain 2 (Eve) relates to time through periods of arousal related to cycles of reproduction (cf. Frazier's agricultural Mother-goddesses). Historically, the S* for these linked female spirituality to Moon-phase cycles. (Seasons of Spring planting; summer growing, fall harvesting, winter turning around.)

Brain 1 (Adam) relates to time through names, first affixed to heavenly bodies, star constellations and planets, whose appearance and re-appearance throughout all durations on earth is transmitted through the 5 peripheral senses. It is masculine because it's functioning does not require 'listening' to inner biological cycles other than food (and occassional, not periodic, sex arousal).
Nature's way of re-producing the species leaves Brain 3 impulses furtherest from consciousness, as a once-functional unity; but the deep completion, once established, becomes a retained loop* that later regression seeks to complete again. Thus the snake in Eden is the furtherest away from the God (Father)-Adam-Eve Triad, the "dark (later, missing)" Fourth of the original 3-brain Archetype relating itself to reality through S* understood by humans.



Applying .... 3 TIMES 3

A model of inference-by-Archetype, but still in the bounds of Forms of Reason applied through mathematics to tokenspace -- stretched -- is given by orders of "children" in fractal geometry, applied to human ancestry.

As a personal note: I have only just now come to understand how the Italian mathematician might have arrived at the natural number progression known by his name (1-1-2-3-5-8-13-etc.), in a way that relates: A. the natural reproduction of characteristics through generations of breeding; and B. the "4th turning" template of modern gnosticism. Let Mark => Mar(du)k(e) (the 50: liberator of the children from Tiamat's belly by his sword and magical weapons). The "social network" of Facebook: "500 million members (of) people (who) realy like being alone together." (Ari Melber, the Nation, 10.6.'10) are "we the children" released from our womb, or identified as fetuses-on-the-loose.

This is after the snake brain God, Quezacotl


The model is sketched below. Stated in essentially formal terms, directly translatable into logical symbolism as a deductive theory.

****
If 1. each unit x, in a universe of discourse, has a "Double-Double" generative
('breeding') order respect to (genetic) characteristics G (Gender: Male or Female) and C (Color: white or black).

Where the "Double-Double" order is: 2. By the relation of Dominant-Recessive
A. G over C ("gender trumps race"); and B. Under G, M is dominant, F recessive); under C, W is dominant, B recessive.

And: 2. if the First of the characteristics, G. was Dominant throughout (=> one Gx.y type, Male, imposes more distinctive characteristics on next generation of children)

So that 3. the Second Gxy type was Recessive throughout (=> Female, imposes fewer distinctive characteristics on next generation of children)

Call this the Primary Ordering.

THEN
It follows from the primary ordering that, if the same dominant-recessive ... :

--From all white, to all black skin males, by reversal of gender dominance through the female. (After a while, if white women start mixing genes with black men, even if White is dominant over Black, males with black skin will replace those with white by the passage of time and breeding alone.)