Preemptive Predication (psychosemiotic affront)

Note on Psychosemiotic Fallacy* (Preemptive Predication: pre-vents oxidation)


*Mis-use of Signs in Communication

("You don't need a philosopher's stone if a stoned philosopher will do.")

S* from the High way

Burma-Shave
Was such a boom
They passed
The bride
And kissed the groom

Note: everything I write is part of the system S* elaborated under the title: The Philosophy of Completing Totalities, to appear in print, shortly one hopes.

10.25.10 Monday (now .26 as we speak)

Yesterday was metaphysically exilerating to the max. Many synchronicities cooincided 'following the numbers', 22-23-24. The theme of 'collective Deja vu (<=group trance, regression to fetal origins: Randall Terry today on CNN injecting pictures of unborns getting their heads crushed by pro-abortionists) From many, many signals in the media of underground, under water, dying, buried, suffocating, ... threaded with tokens of rage, hate, fear, self-loathing ... the aim in writing was to put text to an intense, pervasive mood of collective despesration, fought against,; a needing "to get out of it"; re-birth. L. deMause's psychohistory counts election countdowns as rebirth rituals; the desparation would be "its not going to happen". One Senator was already talking about returning to "poisonous atmosphere" after Nov. 2, however it turned out. THE emotional story of America during these days, as told in its media of communication, is the cathexis -- discharge -- of this aroused, uncontained, psychic energy. The notion of "battling it out between opposing factions, so that doing so, and coming together afterwards, can be claimed to "renew the covenant with our founding Fathers" by exercizing free democratic vote of the people. Except, when that happed the last Mid-Term election, the democratic vote to get the hell out of Iraq was SURGE-ically reversed by fiat, funded by deep pockets pro-Israeli lobbyists. That's one major contradiction "AMERICAN DEMOCRACY" communicates, right there. Whoever votes in this one, '1l.10, will help seal over, 'bury', the contradiction to democracy under another contradiction of democracy -- this one. The term "democracy", itself has been inverted by the system of national discourse into a form of group-manipulation and control by sign-use.

This mis-use in America is psychosemiotically linked to what has been done with/to "democracy" in Israel. That is taken up below, following yesterday's reference to the newly stipulated language for its loyalty oath. The context is defining "Israel", as if a newborn were being named. This "re-birth by re-definition' is also going on in re "homophobia" and "the unborn". Birth, sex and little Israel -- obstreperous child if there ever was one -- are the merger fantasies all mix-matched, vivified, and ready to 'come out'. Except we* know in our gut it won't. The 33 miners may have got out, but only after they breathed through a hole in the ground a long time. It hasn't helped us.

Tracing these "matched mis-uses" led to the further analytical delineation of a general type of misdirection in communication, analogous to logical fallacies in reasoning. In the present emotional matrix, regression-into-the-womb-to-be-reborn, actual psychohistorical Archetypes led to uncovering Marduk, God-of-Gods in Sumer-to-Babylon transition as Lord of Creation, of heaven, earth and mankind, circa 2000 b.c. It is in fact, I argued, "little Israel's alter (VERY BIG) ego", the personification of Religious Nationalism crossed with Politicized Militarism: the psychosemiotic essence of "neoconservatives." This politics was Israeli centric, dictating foreign policy to the G.W. Bush administration. Roughly the same lands and regions of the globe 'ruled' by Marduk then, are those under the aegis of "The West" now. The note closed on was: If Israel Bombs Iran, Marduk shall have returned. Next day, this:



http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE69O03C.htm

Hawkish Israeli minister drafts nuclear Iran plan
25 Oct 2010 07:59:58 GMT
Source: Reuters

* Most hawkish Israeli minister wants "day after" plan
* PM Netanyahu officially committed to preventive action
* Retaliatory rockets, diplomatic fallout on Israeli minds
By Dan Williams

JERUSALEM, Oct 25 (Reuters) - Hardline Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has commissioned a report on how to prepare for a nuclear-armed Iran as doubt mounts about the efficacy of preventive action, an Israeli source said on Monday.
Publicly, Israel has pledged to deny the Iranians the means to make a bomb but its previous, centrist government also discreetly drew up "day after" contingency plans should Tehran's uranium enrichment pass the military threshold.
At the time, rightist opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu called for Israel to consider preemptive strikes against its arch-foe's nuclear sites. Now prime minister, Netanyahu has reined in such rhetoric while not ruling out the use of force.
In a sign the government is examining a full range of options, Lieberman, the most hawkish member of Netanyahu's coalition, has ordered ministry strategists to draft a paper on "what to do if we wake up and discover the Iranians have a nuclear weapon", said the senior Israeli political source, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Foreign Ministry planners are also preparing a report on possible responses should the Palestinians unilaterally declare a state taking in all of the occupied West Bank, where continued Israeli settlement has bogged down U.S.-sponsored peace efforts.
Israel is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal. Its aircraft bombed Iraq's atomic reactor in 1981 and launched a similar sortie against Syria in 2007.
But many independent experts believe Israeli forces could not take on Iran alone. The Iranians have dug in, dispersed and prepared to defend many of their nuclear facilities.
Even were its warplanes to manage a successful sneak attack, Israel would almost certainly suffer retaliatory Iranian missile salvoes worse than the short-range rocket attacks of Lebanese and Palestinian guerrillas in the 2006 and 2009 border wars.
There would be a wider diplomatic reckoning: World powers are in no rush to see another regional conflagration, especially while sanctions are still being pursued against an Iranian nuclear programme which Tehran says is peaceful.
The planning department of Israel's Foreign Ministry is one of several units guiding government strategy. Chief among these are the National Security Council and an inner cabinet made up of Netanyahu and six other top ministers, including Lieberman. Netanyahu's office declined comment on the Lieberman initiative. A senior Israeli official said: "The government's position is that all attempts have to be made to prevent Iran from going nuclear."
The Israelis have voiced cautious confidence in sanctions. But they also believe Tehran could have a nuclear warhead as soon as 2012-2014, an assessment shared by some in the West.
Israeli defence officials have placed a priority on improving the national missile shield and bolstering a network of civilian bomb shelters -- a posture that may herald resilience in the face of an eventual nuclear-armed Iran or a bracing for reprisals should Israel strike Iran first. (Editing by Noah Barkin)

****

Preemptive predication

-on disputed relations expressed in doubles* (~S/S*)^ ("Nibiru (black sun) approaches (planet earth) ...

..has the psychosemiotic effect of positioning you* (*<= whoever responds) in the situation of being judged good-or-bad (rewarded or punished) according to your reaction. This poisons the atmosphere of communication.


Examples: 1. "nuclear Iran" (<= below: elicits 'opposed to' reaction for pro-Israeli lobby)

2. "Jewish and democratic" <= adjective inserted between "The" and "State of Israel" in official references to "The State of Israel" => "The Jewish and democratic State of Israel." But the inserted adjective not only preemptively predicates religious identity of the otherwise secular state, roundly rejected by Arab-Palestinians; by coupling it with "democratic" -- when that is precisely what it is NOT -- the new designation actually effects self-contradiction. Its logical motive, consciously or unconsciously entertained, is to head off what a real democratic Israel would look like, a few years down the road: "The Arab State of Israel."