Sweet Daddies & Mean Muthas - USA Today12.2

SWEET DADDIES & MEAN MUTHAS

(To Eve: Stick with Adam)

-Psychodynamics of Pathogical Reversal

Combining the psychological depth-grammars of C.G. Jung (Analytical/Archetypal psychology) and S. Freud (Psychoanalysis)

Transpersonal Psychology:

Signature Conjunction: gender as symbolism (intra-psychic marriage of spirit*instinct opposites <= deepest split of autonomous psychic energy differentiated in process of individual development).

The ability to think both sides of the polarity as a unity without becoming psychotic (<= reliving humanity's psychosis) requires assimilating the economic* model of psychic function, combining memory-states from both lower (libidinal/appetitative) and upper (noetic/conceptual) strata of self-observation. The learned accomodation in action adapted by the two independently organized strata, one forming 'the mind', the other moving (motivating) 'the body', constitutes the flow of psychic process as an individual personality.

-Nannystate me, TSA! -- "we'll pat down your socks and knock off your rocks! Hillary went through here yesterday!" (<=Freudian psychoanalysis)

This distinguishes Archetypal from personal psychology

Anima - Female (side of the) psyche: the male unconscious

Animus - Male (side of the) psyche: the female unconscious. Differentiation of the female gendered psyche requires


The anima of the animus: Female side of the Male unconscious


SWEET DADDY -- this can be arrived at in different ways, creating polarized opposites by development due to 'vicissitudes of instinct' (<=personal psychohistory)

This stratum of the personality remains undeveloped in Olbermann/Maddow/Nation maledom. This variety of SWEET DADDY (=>homosexual friendly) male is insufferable.., matching the human distortion of pious homophobes protesting military funerals. The only empathy they have, or can have, with instinctual revulsion to homosexual male coupling comes by way of distorted representation; as if they were driven to destroy it before it destroyed them. Thus ....

When the Dems in the U.S. political scene are called upon to "Man Up!" -- you don't want to see them do it; really. There's a limit to how much grosquerie the human psyche can stand before 'one part rebels against another' (G.). When that happens, coherent mind-body functioning breaks down at the most vulnerable point in the organization. In Freud's analysis of hysterical conversion, a chronic state of over-agitated mind-set, compulsively centering around a few 'powerful*' (<= highly cathected) Ideas*,... symbolicly triggers (or vice versa) involuntary movements recognizable as 'acting out' a related fantasy content ( => the "as if" reality to which the body relates, through The Unconscious side of S*). This is what I fear may happen if Harry Reed/Nancy Pelosi Democrats start Man-ning Up! to China. When that happens, it's time for the Coaches ...referees, Master Scoreboard Watchers, Somebody ... too blow the whistle. Call TIME OUT! STOP! "We don't want to see you do it!" It's not really a state it is tolerable to see species cohorts in. It's not just grotesque (<=Olbermann defiantly reading Thurber on primetime TV, as his Mother did for him as a child, and he loved so much).

Hysterical Conversion: TSA volupuaries at your airport of Choice! (--part of the homosexual agenda..) That's the point. The Repubes are taunting Dems with crotch searches.




The animus of the anima: Male side of the Female unconscious--
MEAN MOTHERS


***
I am running into discrimination and hatred everytime I try to address the National Conversation, as such, in categories objectively applicable to its dominant psychological processes. This constitutes denial of my inalienable right to participate in the on-going democratic process in terms that address its source of legitimate authority. This is what the Colonials were required to do to create the grammar used in honoring America today. The controlling grammar was built into the discourse by heritage of English monarchy, predicated on Lordship of Sovereign Majesty of King and Queen. That was the accepted Idea of collective group-authority. At a time in which women descendants of old genetic bloodlines were rising to honor across broadly Western lands and Princely Houses, the manhood honored Her Royal Navy, combining

ARGUMENTS FOR GAYS* IN THE MILITARY (heard recently).

I. "It's innate" -- justification of male homosexuality.

"(They/we) are born that way."

Reply: this admits it is a condition, not a choice. Therefore 'choice' should not apply to the practice of homosexuality any more than to one born with drools (=*rare laryngal genetic condition, tendency toward which can be 'fed' by later re-inforcements, e.g., stimulating the drool reflex by offering fresh scent, then snatching away the fruit). This can be compared to the relation of whatever genetic variation may be specifically related to what is called now 'sexual orientation', and an entire lifestyle based on it. Some genetic variation may establish, say, tendency toward gentler, more delicate, less testeronish behavior, but it would be absurd, in my opinion, to suppose it propelled compulsion to stroke male, rather than female genitals.

"Can heterosexuals remember a time they chose to be straight?"

Several things need explaining if further discourse is to be possible.

1. if homosexuality is a genetic 'from-birth' condition, this question cannot arise except by confused negation of the idea that physiology, not psychology, determines 'choice' (<=subtext: not choice at all, just called that to tweak).


2. "Straight" has shifted here, by metaphor, through grammar, from: A. predicate of a line in space; to B. predicate of normal sexual development.
Consistently applied, the same metaphor entails "deviate", or "crooked" as predicate for "not-straight". However, these evoke a negative reaction, implying justification for "perverse", under moral use, for those condemning it. Therefore the metaphor is broken*, its disapprobriate implication split-off (repressed), and "gay" gets substituted as psycho-logized opposite of "straight". This reversal loop poisons discourse. Any further appeal to ratonality, predicated on this Reversal*, is already negated by this psychosemiotic move. Here is where the "flip-flop' occurs. Attachment of entirely advententious pseudo-tautology to description of normal sexuality, using appeal to love with pleasure as a bridge, flips the Idea-frame of perception, and recall, of sexuality.

3. MARRIAGE of opposites: sexual - symbolic. These two separate and distinct levels of meaning in marriage vows is split, when uttered w/o the intention that the state of spiritual union expressed be reproduced in the couple's children. "I do", pronounced in sacred context, is a token of the higher totality completed in them. That is how it will be construed by them, against the background of childhood care as source of memory and unconscious fantasy. When the vow does not include this, the effect, consciously intended or not, is to block passing on the transpersonal content. But that is an essential part of the meaning of "love", so expressed. Therefore, the attempt by the homosexual community to redefine marriage in America to include same-sex unions amounts to splitting off and repressing its transpersonal symbolic content.



1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4. (if homosexuality is a genetic condition reversed by euphemism...-> (which) falsely injects pseudo-qualifier into official discourse about sexuality ...-> (functioning to) split off and repress the transpersonal frame* of marriage ...-> then) a. this establishes a psychosemiotic agenda; b. to usurp sacral self-reference by children through their parents marriage; c. terminating this as a transition point for union of opposites completing the totality of the bond HEAVEN-EARTH.)

Fourth Turning (algorithm) - > = < - JUST SAY "NO!" WALL

=> displaced by Republicans onto: Animus against Nannystate TSA liberalism => no nuke treaty with Russia. Revival of Cold War rhetoric of NATO maledom, now threatened by closing of geo-political arc from Saudi Arabia - Mesopotamia - Ural Mt's through Turkey, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, England,

<= Anima of American liberalism: "CHINA 'scared to death' of Pelosi"- http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.53075ad2350ca0616102f4e994a06283.e51&show_article=1

This marks a big reversal as having occurred. The Archetypal liberal leader of the House of Representatives. Democratic vote under America's system, over the years, has deposited 'power of the people' authority in this Archetypal liberal woman from San Francisco, delegated by the Unconscious to deal with China. She is Anima backed up by no real Animus (inner male/father).