Psyshosemiotic Asymptotes

Psychosemiotic Asymptotes*

WE'RE NEARLY THERE...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/world/middleeast/16mideast.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=mid%20east%20peace%20talks&st=cse
Mrs. Clinton, before a morning meeting with the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, acknowledged the “skepticism that many Israelis feel.” But she said the “status quo is unsustainable,” adding, “that doesn’t mean it can’t be sustained for a year, or a decade, or two or three.”


<=algorythm of psycho-physical process (see below). The form of repetition linking Space and time and time in TokenSpace.

-Two expanding lines of psychohistorical Token-threads, one straight, the other curved, converging by law of decreasing ratios to infinity but never touching.

Let x's = moments ordered by time-indices (first, second, third, fourth). "TM(x)" = "x is a Time Moment in an ordered sequence (as day, week, month, year, etc.)".
Let y's = successive phases in a completing process, e.g., birth, waxing / / waning, death as biological life cycle. "CP(y)" = "y is a First, Second, Third or Fourth stage segment of the life cycle".

The predicates "TM" and "CT" belong to different orders of totality.* Values of the x variable under TM, form a linear time-line in which no unit repeats, as in numbers. Formally, the relation of any two points, x', x'', one before, the other after, stand in transitive, asymmetrical, irreflexive "before-after" relation to each other in experience. "The same moment of time" cannot literally "return", if "return" is a relation between two TM(x)'s; the identity requires two name-tokens to assert, which contradicts the assertion of their identity. ("TMa . TMb . a is before b . a=b)" is a self-contradiction, when "a is before b". Therefore there can be no Moment in Time when "time itself starts over"; it is a logical impossibility, built into the grammar of unified time measurement of all processes.
****
*This formalism varies from the conventional assumption of a single variable, for predicates or functions f (e.g. the sentence form "f(x)" for "x is f") of any unspecified type. In standard logical notation, if TM* and CT* were both "predicates", "TM*(x)" and "CT(x)" are equally well-formed for a domain of substitution instances a,b,c,//; "y", also, for any domain of identical substitution instances d,e,f.... The formal syntax leaves open the truth or falsity of x=y, defined by Leibniz's rule of "identity of indiscernibles' ("any two objects x, y are identical if and only if all predicates true of one are true of the other": "x=y" =df. "(f)(f(x) iff (f)(y)"). However, the purpose here is to schematize x's along a line of time-moments, and y's along a line of completion-stages. and the difference between these as 'time-grammars' is fused, and confused, by assumming the x's of one were interchangeable with the y's of the other.
In fact, beginning with the categorical difference of predicates (which themselves will be further predicated on and under) TM* and CT* as texts, it is confusing to even assume the possibility of such identity. That is why the separate variables were chosen for the entities in their respective domains.

However, there is a meta-formal identity, as it were, through "fourness" itself, as
-last* in a divisible 1*-2*-3*- preparatory sequence.

At one stage in historical human consciousness, this was objectified in time-reckoning; e.g., the Month as completion of 4 stages of the moon, and 4 weeks of seven days, each one a diurnal revolution on its own axis. By these orders and ratios, Great Nature worked as a teacher of "time", to thought and consciousness. If the lines formed by x's and y's can be related as asymptotes, the algorythm of its unity, the form of its* Moment of Moments, is The Fourth (process turning). Mathematical tinkering with that schema, plus tracking the 365 1/4 number of diurnals required to bring the sun back to the same fixed reference-point in the sky, determined by constellations of fixed stars, led to the calendar still in use.

It follows, further, that the concept of biological Totalities Completing in four-phase cycles, can be expanded asymptotically. This applies to "God", as Completing Totality relative to consciousness, as a unity under thought. The thought of unending, cosmic conscious universal Being is of an order distinctd from time and number. However, by expanding the Unity of duration by ratios corresponding to multiples of years -- number of diurnal cycles of Sol by Earth -- the concept of God as Conscious Completing Totality can be approached asympotically. The figure of "asympotic cone of acceptance" is formed, outside the limit of which nothing exists in the temporal universe. Such would be the Four Yugas of Hindu time-reckoning (see Rene Guenon, The Reign of Quantity) as an Archetype of Eternity. The four stages trace devolution of unity of consciousness from Quality to Quantity, as lengthy zodiacal durations, each shorter by half than its predecessor. The transition from pre-historical tanscendtalism to digital communication is reign of Quantity incarnate -- Tokens of old soul-completing Qualities threaded by text of "neo-"conservatives, whose centre of gravity is Israel. America's soul digitalized by Israel's 'right to exist' (<= state targeted assassinations of those living abroad; ..etc.)

http://www.answers.com/topic/asymptotic-cone-of-acceptance

geophysics) The solid angle in the celestial sphere from which particles have to come in order to contribute significantly to the counting rate of a given neutron monitor on the surface of the earth.




http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Asymptotic+analysis
asymptotic formula [ā‚sim′täd·ik ′fȯr·myə·lə]
(mathematics)

A statement of equality between two functions which is not a true equality but which means the ratio of the two functions approaches 1 as the variable approaches some value, usually infinity.


THE ~1-1-2-3/ /5-.. process Algorythm

The 'hesitation in the unconscious' between 3 and 4 is the moment of psychic indecision between choice of memory-cycles, following tokens (TMx's) or texts (CTy's). --