Psychosemiotic Argument

Summary of Group-Fantasy Situation
Argument for taking it as a proper reading of the Whole below

1. =>US stands objectively under unchallenged Insult at the hands of the pariah state Israel.

2. <= Nuclear arms blackmail; PR planks laid on the ground for attacking Iran (new items; UK expels Israeli ambassador over Dubai murder; ex-CIA officer on CNN 9.58-10:00 am segment, with ‘new evidence’ linking Iran and Taliban, using the phrase “The Taliban and its allies” for the first time, I believe. The BIG WWIII HUSTLE.

3. => followed by big, up close pictures of Netanyahu and Hillary Clinton, showing US-Israel solidarity, fresh from AIPAC speech, headlined “tough talk”. Netanyahu to meet Obama later today. Now that Israel has given its insult and manned up to harsh punishment, the atmosphere is cleared for face-to-face talk between the two nation’s leaders. No “You insulted us” hangs in the air.

4. <= Click to MSNBC for winter White House background picture, proudly announcing
“OMAMA TO SIGN HEALTH CARE BILL LATER TODAY” -- a historic text and triumph of will

5. => Click to Fox News: Chief Advisor Axelrod, shown up-close earnestly proclaiming President Obama CHAMPION and steadfast HERO of The People, without whose steely resolve and spine there would be no legacy of help for kids line little 6 year old Erin, facing a life of medical expenses. “He Is The Man”, Axelrod was saying (as, for Tiger Woods they say “He Be De Man”). And Rahm Emanuel will poke you in the naked chest if you squeal.

****
The Big Picture comes into view when these are run through the mind and surveyed as a completing totality. 5. Right Hand Staff Axelrod supplies personal-existential testimony OMAMA STRONG LEADER, proven through 4. This then glosses the reversal shown at 3.: his replacement at his Secretary of State’s side, female, depicts a weak leader under Israel’s thumb. 2. demonstrates what he can do to continue to count as a hero, not a wuss. The psychically oppressive situation marked by 1. remains unrelieved.


****
Psychosemiotic argument: a string of S* (ex. 1.-5. above; ‘predications’) whose form illustrates a completing totality. The Form is seen in the ‘minds eye’ only by survey of the whole (“patern”) after assembling and dwelling on them. Here, the S* string begins from an ‘atmospheric’ content as the starting point in objectively connected predications. The relation of psychosemiotic and strictly logical argument are, first, grammar inclusive of all content of consciousness vs syntax of strictly discursive discourse; and, second, the formal transitions guaranteeing salva veritate passage in the whole are mediated by fantasy templates on Collective Unconscious planes. Connecting the bytes in these templates is soul-talk. Soul talk is formally protected from internal self-contradiction, in principle, by the theory of Logical Token Types, left unfinished by Bertrand Russell. Circumscribing the self-contradictory form (~S/S*)^ at each Token Type-level blocks Russell’s paradox arising when “predicates of all predicates” is predicated on. Such formal demonstration of self-consistency within the Collective Unconscious as a totality, itself, however, is powerless to protect against slackness, or the will to sin against it (predicating on self-contradiction for gain).