The System S*

The System S*

Formal Sector of the Philosophy of Completing Totalities.



(Outlining Metaphysics of Psychosemiotic entailment here: what can be inferred from sign-use, given the 4-Quadrant schema of S* process)

DOUBLE TWO LEVELS* of Sign Use (S*)

1 -Upper vs Lower Triads
2 -Sacral (holy-tinged) vs Vulgar vernacular language of self-reference. (S* tinged with (cathecting) fantasies from fetal origins of experience)


Where encountered in experience:

-Awareness of intention vs. awareness of body movement (in self-expressing)

--Feeling in gut; thinking with head. These may not agree at all. They are independent processes, consistent with possible reality when squared "(S/S*)^". The opposite, "(S/S*)^", is text-reversed-token squared. Alternately put: "the sign-use S* squared under self-contradiction".

---This occurs when use of a token bearing more than one text splits levels of use as context, as when "soul" is used ambiguously for the subjective site of "passion" and "holiness".

----One must PSYCHOSEMIOTICALLY SENSE (mentally 'feel') the difference between "all" and "every" before proceeding with understanding of logical syntax and mathematics. Manipulation of signs (words, pictures, numbers) by rules of deduction, as by computers, assume this distinction which was first thought, then tokenized, belongs to a necessary order in communication even more foundational than mathematics. Indeed, the psychosemiotic insight the distinction formalizes, by use of individually specified tokens and rules, defines the state-position of consciousness engaged in the process of logical reasoning, which proceeds, of course, entirely 'instinctively' without such formal-schematic aid. The four- Quadrant schema of psychosemiotic processing isolates the formal pattern present in all communication, bringing each instance under a source common to consciousness. Each instance exemplifies



DE-LEGITIMIZING ADL's AMERICA

THE USURPERS* HAVE RENDERED RATIONAL DISCOURSE WITH THEM IMPOSSIBLE (*=> political conjunction of Women, Blacks, Homos and Jews* (Zionist ideologues)

Their pre-emptive co-opting of sacral tokens of collective American sign-use has poisoned the life-blood of communication, infecting the soul of whoever uses "we" in communicating with them. This is unconscious (in most) psychosemiotic reversal of the trauma suffered at the hands of Nazis; regressed and projected onto whoever criticizes the state of Israel

Note: this is "Projection-reversal" as a state-position of group-consciousness: 'flashback'/return to existential level of infancy/childhood, exchanging parent-child relationship -- as if the regressed adult were the child and the child were the all-powerful, judging parent. Ex. "You want to kill me, don't you!" -- actual videotaped words of mother screaming at child... while waving butcher knife in the air. Mother's fantasy of killing her newborn in states of post-partem depression, in order to return to infancy again herself, also proceeds from projection-reversal. As a mechanism, this is the most powerful, malevolent, silent (emerging at any given sign of being-judgment, by self or others), irrational, psychotic.

'America' is at the hither end of projection-reversal toward Israel: in regressed terror felt by the 'parent' that its 'child' wants to kill them. (As well it might; the Israeli lobby picks up on this dynamic and piles on the occassions for the 'regressed parent' to FURTHER REPREPRESS its psychosis, turning fetal rage back onto itself in self-destructive convulsions.)

Any legal regime requiring citizens to reproduce previously sacralized tokens of their historical totality in mix-matched texts as accepted sign-use systematically sets up Projection-Reversal as the normal Dasein situation. That is because sacral uses, as felt, communicate content of (what is later called) faith, hope, love and conscience, manifest in original instinctive energy early, from the beginning, but get split off from the flow of later adult perceptual processes, due to 'education'. Under these conditions, the native energy of these impulses can only be released by regression. We go into "Moral Rages", which can include extended convulsive muscle spasms. This analysis can be applied to America's will-to-war in the Middle East: moral judgment is aroused, then (with Abe Foxman's help and insistence) internalized, then re=projected onto all-powerful GITMO INMATES! -- and the like. The fear is they will "get ouit" and administer what is so harshly, violently judged to be deserved, by those early impulses of faith, hope, love and conscience.

All "enemies" are unconscious projection-reversals. The normal, adapted, mature, consciously squared feeling state has no more 'enemies' than a horse in the wild; which doesn't mean they won't lookout for predator species.

To be related to as someone's projection-reversed 'child', whend they are in a state of regression, creates hate. That is its karmic feedback, felt as self-revulsion (projected onto the other) in the act of manifesting it-

****

Returning to philosophy:

This all pervasive psychosemiotic situation can only be corrected in propositional, non-set theoretical logic. Propositional logic applies to processes re-thinking the connection between language and reality present in native, instinctive S* connections; whereas digitalized logic takes any 1-1 name-thing connection that happens to get applied (such as "winner of the 2000 presidential election"). "Positive" set-theoretical logic will digitally reproduce the falsely mix-matched S*, distributing squared reversals throughout linked layers of collective consciousness. And that is how this manipulated psychosemiotic regime is all set to reproduce itself through collective mind. Self-appointed "(I)-> WE" delegates of the new political totalities, 1-1 referenced to pre-judged subjective attitudes, will create false/black flag incidents requiring group-alignment reaction, with acting-out imposed linguistic identities.

In order to avoid this happening, the Audience (Quadrant II) must be purged of their presence. Their* consciousness, shared by those obliged to projectively address it, imposes a grammatical process resulting in squaring mix-matched self-contradictory sign-uses. These, in turn, are distributed by the media of mass communication through the seven token levels (Quadrant III); further resulting, through the bow-tie loop ariund the "+", in historical output (Quadrant IV), This result, self-contained, includes dates, sites, authors, consciousness- indices (this, that, over there, etc.). But also the (~S*/S*)^. Then, most precipitously and terribly, this content, re-perceived by appearing in "the News", commentary, etc., is re-perceived, taken up into the perceptual process (Quadrant I) becoming Karmic Feedback. Thus, what originates in (~S*/S*)^ re-loops the reversals imposed by collective grammar into/through the psychic apparatus. That is catastrophic, because all of the distinctions, issues, disagreements in propositions grounded in psychosemiotic processing become entrenched in a way that escapes rational confrontation. Any disagreement, expressen in theior terms, for instance, will require one to align with either pro-Hitler or pro-Zionist reaction to the swastika on Plymouth Rock. Or to align with either 'stratght' or 'gay' applications of 'marriage', these having been linked through reversal of partners in copulation from hetero- to homo-sexual.

PRE-EMPTING VALUE AMBIGUITIES => REVERSING MEANINGS => RE-MIX/MATCHING TEXT-TOKENS -> CO-OPTING: the grammar of public national discourse 1. by re-defining old tokens with new text, so that oppositions implicit in the old uses are reversed in/by the new ones.

The chief current examples, as of 8.4.'10, are: Iran/Israel nukes; 'same-sex marriage'; grammar of "legal" S* under official Catholic-Jewish domination in Roberts-Kagan contratempts .

This "legal", "under the constitution", use is a positivistic value-disambiguation of "legitimate", which entails 'moral', or 'ought-to- be". Thus, there can be regimes that are legitimate, in positive terms; but not legitimate by moral standards. Jewish survivors of "the Holocaust" would likely judge that to be the case for The Third Reich (calling Hitler a "dictator" vs duly legalized leader of Germany).

That is what has in fact happened to America. What is counted as legal and legitimate in the sense of positivist paper-trail, is not morally legitimate because the Group-Fantasy/I-We delegate position of consciousness has been usurped. We => descendants of America's Founding Fathers and heirs to their Spiritual legacy. This has been done aggressively, over a long period of time (1996f.), now culminating in the issue of bombing Iran.


PROJECTIVELY PRE-EMPTED SYMOLIC SIGN-USE

The ADL's declaration that the swastika, matched with the Third Reich, which persecuted Jews, is a "universal hate symbol", citing a graffiti inscription on Plymouth rock. His argument mix-matches the most recognizable token of Hitler's Germany with that of most recognizable American origins. This juxtaposition -- symbol of hatred of Jews on Plymouth Rock -- is, indeed, an abomination, But only due to Third Reich Jewish projection.
Prior to WWII, subsequently grammatized by Zionist ideology, it would likely have been taken to depict a fire wheel, communicating energy-in-motion (as '-ing' does in English). The Jewish experience under Hitler is used by Abe Foxman's ADL, arbiter of who is 'infected' with 'anti-Semitism', to retro-projectively poison the energy of America's origins.

*****



Theologically: "God" - Monotheistic vs. Trinitarian
Philosophically: types of logic: propositional (Russell) vs set-theoretical (Cantor, Quine) -- totalities vs. units. Phil. of law:
Existentially:

Ex.: "straight" "gay" "sexual orientation" "marriage"

- Imposing barriers to confronting and exposing existential manipulation

-The S* of Recent events connect: marriage* equal* rights*
==> (entailing by karmic feedback) the grammar of copulation: male-female (called 'straight') /vs./ male-male//female/female (called 'gay', or 'Gay Lesbian')