Mysterium Conjunctionis

SHORT HISTORY OF WHAT I AM IS

CHAPTER TWO Mysterium Conjunctionis

-SYMBOLS => Union of Opposites in Upper Triad. What you know* is herein contained. (Ex.: the Word before it became Flesh: carnal incognition.)

-Or: Aquarius as The Age of Titillation


Summary of Chapter One: America’s soul has been seduced by false appropriation of Biblical => philosophical =>liberal democratic political “I AM”’s distributed mechanically each day, 24/7, throughout the population by the media of mass communication. (Ex.: Christ => Deutchbank passion)


continuing…

Objective Containers

Constructs from all token types are provided by the ambient S* of each individual’s group womb-surround (cosmic, planetary, national, local), where-whenever they exist. Each 3 brain being (person) occupies a standpoint in the objective space-time container of the womb-surround. This objective container is internalized by the person’s image of themselves acting in, and addressing, this containing totality as “audience”. Each “they/you” is an “I-Me” unfolding an individualized “Self”, in so far as it retains inner continuity between later present moments and birth. Thus, the Symbolic representation of life’s developmental trajectory as a Self will be a composite unity of the basic psychological opposites traversed at different levels and durations of S*5, “I/me” sign-uses. Graphics of the stages on this process are constructed by masters in the form of mandalas, which are thus Symbols of the Self as an Archetype. It’s* psychosemiotic form as a union of opposites is also shown in depiction of The Self, as completed totality, as Tom Thumb -- the ‘little guy” “I” on the stage of human history.

Each Zodiacal Age, being a balance of psychological opposites attained thus far by humanity, largely through The Bible in Western civilization, posits a signature Self symbol for the advancing period. Traced through “people of The Book”, as some call those educated on Bible templates, these Ages coincide with: Taurus (4000 bc) => Ram (2000 bc) => Pisces (0 bc-ad) => Aquarius (2000 ad). The Self Symbol of Pisces was Christ (‘fisher of men’); that of Aquarius is the water bearer, poured water not reaching the ground.

Some take Luke 22.10 to mark the transition from Pisces to Acquarius. In it, The Master is dispatching Peter and John to arrange a room* for himself and the twelve* disciples in which the Jewish Passover* will be observed, symbolically substituting His* body* and blood* for the bread and wine used to commemorate Moses/YHWH’s slaying of the first-born throughout Pharoahs Egypt, sparing the Children of Israel who as an enslaved Tribe, painted blood of a lamb sacrifice on their lentil. This is the deep symbolic meaning of crucifixion: a Passing-over, Squared* by Incarnation of Holy Passover “Day”remembrance: Son’s blood on the Cross <=
(overlaying) ‘redemptive’ lamb’s blood on the lintel. Against this background, the words: “Behold, when you have enered the city, a man will meet you carrying a pitcher of water; follow him into the house which he enters. Then you shall say ato the master of the house, “The Teacher says to you, “Where is the guest room where I may eat the Passover with My disciples?” This is the template re-enacted in each Catholic mass to this day. Reading the symbolic S* it connects => The Christ*Word of Pisces will/has become the water poured out in Aquarius that does not hit the ground. (Leaving the esoteric meaning of this detail tbc)

***
Metaphysical Appendage


“Audience*” addressed in sign-use is Quadrant II of the S* matrix, continuing the silent, perpetual Archetypes shining in Objective TokenSpace tranquility through the containing ‘atmospheres’.

Recap: QI = SW; QII =NE; Q3=NW; Q4=SE (use left-to right bow-tie loop to link the regular N-S, E-W map quadrants ( + )

QI-- process=> QII – Audience* => QIII – token/texting (the seven token type hierarchy S*7-1)) => QIV – Resultant (actual S* sequence => karmic feedback through re-uptake of S* in QI <= completed transit of all four quadrants of tokenspace, as an internal totality, in any actual occasion of sign-use. ) (cf. “Mad Cow” recycle)

The S*7-1 (QIII) on each person’s private* Wall (*phenomenal content of consciousness), are linked ‘on the other side of the nose bridge’ to other’s use of the same S*. As when A says to B: “Do you see the blue spot on the wall over there?”, and B responds “I do”; so that the same (roughly speaking; allowing for variation in the percepts) color quality is present in two distinct visual fields under the predicate “blue”. When the word “blue” is exchanged in conversation without a visual quality, it is said to communicate by means of “the idea of blue”. Each normal person is able to call up a mental image of a blue percept, and to pick up an object reflecting that hue, upon hearing the word. Shifting from signs for qualities, type S*2, to signs for groups, type S*5.321, the category of “We”- tokens purports to bridge this ontological gap in the communication situation -- the ‘two-sided nose bridge’. The notion of “the same word”, taking any “word” as S*, an actual sign-in-use, analyzes into: A. distinct tokens in private tokenspace; B. common textual content.

The We* vocabulary contains signs assumed to communicate identical content whichever side of the bridge one is on. Among S* in general, this would include first and foremost number, operations on numbers in arithmetic, algebra, calculus; measurements applying numbers to gradients in size, motion; geometry; maps and co-ordinate systems; then, in the twentieth century, these uses of number merge with – or emerge from – formal deductive logic and set theory. The fixed certainties of mathematical-logical relationships have been properly taken, throughout Western thought, as a field of knowledge determined entirely through its own inherent rationality, or “logic”, in the most general sense of textual order. Informally, in meme-talk, this is “Plato’s Heaven – the world of Pure Forms” reached by thought alone. The lower, empirical world is not fixed. It is incessantly changing, in all six directions (cf. The Timaeus), at every locality. Except in the sky, where cyclic change measured by number and geometry was also Unchanging, and the natural content of perception onto which mathematical certainty was projected was “The Heavens”. This content was the common We => number => cosmic container => of Logos/Rationality known in astronomy (also: music, grammar). It is only natural that human intellectual development should have proceeded through belief in One God Intelligence ‘known’ through the rationality displayed in the spheres of celestial bodies. Quotes are put around ‘known’ here because the question of “what knowledge” is, if attained, was metaphysically undetermined, since: A. the word for it was related to sexual intercourse (as in carnal knowledge), therefore given with sublimated cathexis; and B. the distinction between drempt vs. physically situated reality was not clearly drawn in ancient minds to criticize ‘knowledge’. As a result of these two factors, “knowledge of God” would cathect a very powerful content, desire for completing personal totality by ‘knowing’ God in Heaven through rationality. This drive could go with splitting off of sexuality from the psychic totality, with possible repression; but need not necessarily do so. The question for psychic development raised next is: What is the relation of sexuality to The Holy? For once “God” enters into communication as a Name for common We* content, the powerful but most easily neglected content of The Holy presents itself. That is because the common ever-arousable birth trauma-drama, from which the experiential datum arises at a developmental level below sense perception. but pervading a given present totality. At its acme, a ‘flashback’, influx of vivacity without diminution of quality.


“God” (S*7-1 (Holy) complete the common text of psychic totality, taking S*1 as lowest level fetal-origin dream-state totality.

Sacred texts complete the soul totality. This is the I AM => Anima, for men and the I AM => Animus, for women. Sacred texts are thus a mysterium conjunctionis, a union-of opposites. This is depicted by the Moses-Aaron//snake-rod double double, through which the I AM of “YHWH” entered human communication. From which, the narrative of Jesus Christ redeems humanity (if accepted as doing so).

****


The seque from John Stevens, liberal protestant male member of the Supreme Court, to Elena Kagan, if it occurs. reverses opposites: gender (male to female), religion (Protestant to Jewish), and sexual orientation (hetero-to-homo). But these opposites manifest only in private personal Tokenspace, at three soul vertices*: gender attraction, sense of the Holy, libido discharge. Perception of The Other (from either side of the gender divide) with attraction; sense of cosmic beauty strained through fetal origins of experience (from which the common bio-neural sense of The Holy originates); cathected-to as higher-order Oxygens* completing the totality of brain functions. (Psychosemiotic note: text completes token totalities, as: all A’s, B’s, C’s… are conceptually given as “alphabetic characters”, available for use in word combinations, indices, metaphors, and ‘tweeting’. Only by a context tacitly specifying a set of rules of use (spelling, grammar) are complete idea-messages, or ‘thoughts’ formed. )

The psychosemiotic calamity befallen American national discourse consists in re-texting ITS sacral tokens to apply to Others (Catholic and Jew) private group fetal narratives. In effect, converting all that is Christic in the crucified Son of Man into the earlier, animal-child sacrifice opposites of shared group fantasy. <= This is ‘neoconized secular’: “America” as Church-State container for the common denominator Mother-based consciousness. Aquarius as the Age of Titillation.